The Anatomy of the Transmission of Macroprudential Policies
Journal of Finance, forthcoming.
Co-author: Viral Acharya, Katharina Bergant, Tim Eisert, Fergal McCann
Paper · BibTeX · Google Scholar · Online Appendix
The Design and Transmission of Central Bank Liquidity Provisions
Journal of Financial Economics, 141(1), July 2021, 27-47.
Co-author: Luisa Carpinelli
ECB Young Economist Award.
Paper · BibTeX · Google Scholar
The (Unintended?) Consequences of the Largest Liquidity Injection Ever
Journal of Monetary Economics, 112, June 2020, 97-112.
SUERF/UniCredit Foundation Research Prize.
Co-authors: Miguel Faria-e-Castro and Luìs Fonseca
Paper · BibTeX · Google Scholar
Zombie Credit and (Dis-)Inflation: Evidence from Europe
Being revised for resubmission at the Journal of Finance
Co-authors: V. Acharya, T. Eisert, C. Eufinger, December 2020
Paper · BibTeX · VoxEU · WSJ · FT · Liberty Street
FRBNY/NYU FI 2019, MonPolicy & Reality, FIRS 2020, Cavalcade 2020, WFA 2020, AFA 2021
Abstract: We show that “zombie credit”—cheap credit to impaired firms—has a disinflationary effect. By helping distressed firms to stay afloat, such credit creates excess production capacity, thereby putting downward pressure on product prices. Granular European data on inflation, firms, and banks confirm this mechanism. Industry-country pairs affected by a rise of zombie credit show lower firm entry and exit rates, markups, and product prices, as well as a misallocation of capital and labor, which results in lower productivity, investment, and value added. Without a rise in zombie credit, inflation in Europe would have been 0.4 percentage points higher post-2012.
Pirates without Borders: the Propagation of Cyberattacks through Firms’ Supply Chains Co-authors: Marco Macchiavelli and André Silva, July 2021
Being revised for resubmission at the Journal of Financial Economics
NBER CF Spring 2021
Paper · BibTeX · Liberty Street
Abstract: This paper examines the supply chain effects of the most damaging cyberattack in history so far. The attack propagated from the directly hit firms to their customers, causing a four-fold amplification of the initial drop in profits. These losses were larger for affected customers with fewer alternative suppliers. Internal liquidity bu ers and increased borrowing, mainly through bank credit lines, helped firms navigate the shock. Nonetheless, the cyberattack led to persisting adjustments to the supply chain network, with affected customers terminating relations with directly hit firms and forming new ones with alternative suppliers with a stronger cybersecurity posture.
Exorbitant Privilege? Quantitative Easing and the Bond Market Subsidy of Prospective Fallen Angels
Co-authors: Viral Acharya, Ryan Banerjee, Tim Eisert, Renée Spigt, February 2022
AFA 2022 · EFA 2022 · NBER SI EFEL 2021 · Oxford Macro-Finance 2021 · NBER SI CF/RISK 2022
Paper · BibTeX · Liberty Street · FT · Bloomberg
Abstract: We document capital misallocation in the U.S. investment-grade (IG) corporate bond market, driven by quantitative easing (QE). Prospective fallen angels—risky firms just above the IG rating cutoff—enjoyed subsidized bond financing since 2009, especially when the scale of QE purchases peaked and from IG-focused investors that held more securities purchased in QE programs. The benefiting firms used this privilege to fund risky acquisitions and increase market share, exploiting the sluggish adjustment of credit ratings in downgrading after M&A and adversely affecting competitors’ employment and investment. Eventually, these firms suffered more severe downgrades at the onset of the pandemic.